Why the Keating Five is More than Relevant

Mon, October 6, 2008

Uncategorized

Ancient history? McCain wasn’t found to have any ethics violations so why does it matter?

This says it a whole lot better than I ever could ….

Poor judgment, a continuing commitment to deregulation and little concern for taxpayers.

We really can’t afford that combination.

    Related Posts:

    7 Responses to “Why the Keating Five is More than Relevant”

    1. Anonymous Says:

      Huh? Could you please translate your second sentence into English?

    2. sheila Says:

      No, we really can’t afford that combination. (again)

      I question whether Palin went on her own with trying to stir the ‘terrorist’ pot. I think she’s stepped ‘in it’ this time. No one bothered to talk about the Keeting 5 until she started this. Now the whole thing is opened up again.

      What a dummy! I guess if you drag out the trash, some of it is bound to get on your hands. lol.

      McCains past is a problem in the campaign…Obama’s (when he was 8, is that included??) is not.

    3. Donna Says:

      People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones……

      Keating 5 and Troopergate…..two reasons that Palin and McCain should have taken a much higher road.

    4. JZMom Says:

      Sadly, the best part about this video is that you realize how OLD John McCain is. He actually looks kind of good in these videos; then you see the *real* him, and realize he looks like crap!

      Yes, bringing it down to the shallow…

    5. Anonymous Says:

      pundit mom you must have involuntarily left the law profession.

      An attorney who says “McCain wasn’t found to have any ethics violations so why does it matter?”

      This is why the law profession is so reviled by us common folk.

    6. PunditMom Says:

      My question? It was rhetorical. We lawyers do that sometimes. :)

    7. Anonymous Says:

      Just because it is rhetorical does not make it intelligent. I could ask rhetorically – Socialism and Communism has killed untold Millions of people; why do liberals seem hell bent on supporting those ways of governing?


    Leave a Reply