Comments on: Frontal Assault on Reproductive Health Care

By: PunditMom

PunditMom — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:29:17 +0000

Hm. Don’t know why they took down the Orrin Hatch video. It’s not available on YouTube anymore. Will try to find it somewhere else.

By: Daisy

Daisy — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:31:01 +0000

Cause: good birth control coverage, good maternity coverage
Effect: fewer abortions needed.

It’s as simple as cause and effect.

By: jodifur

jodifur — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:21:15 +0000

I don’t think it is just about abortion. I think it is about choosing your own medical care. I have lupus, so my birth control option are limited. The one my doctors recommend for me my health insurance won’t cover. I finally realized I should just pay for it b/c it is about the same price as a bunch of pill co-pays. But I did ask them if they would rather cover a high risk pregnancy.

Okay, sorry, to make this about me, just so aggravated when health insurance companies are allowed to make our medical decisions.

By: Chris Wysocki

Chris Wysocki — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:56:32 +0000

Paying for prostate cancer therapy saves a life.

Paying for abortion snuffs out a life.

So objecting to a curb on prostate cancer therapy is an entirely pro-life position.

By: Tweets that mention Frontal Assault on Reproductive Health Care | PunditMom -- Topsy.com

Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:09:24 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Peggy Moss. Peggy Moss said: RT @PunditMom Worried about what seems like full assault on reproductive care in #hcr bill. http://bit.ly/w9IhP #p2 #fem2 (me too) [...]