<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maria Shriver Says It&#8217;s a Woman&#8217;s Nation. Do You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you</link>
	<description>Having an opinion never goes out of style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Muck Big Rake &#187; A little less conversation, a little more action, please</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-9453</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Muck Big Rake &#187; A little less conversation, a little more action, please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-9453</guid>
		<description>[...] Maria Shriver Says It’s a Woman’s Nation. Do You?by Joanne Bamberger, Oct. 20, 2009, on PunditMom. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maria Shriver Says It’s a Woman’s Nation. Do You?by Joanne Bamberger, Oct. 20, 2009, on PunditMom. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristi</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-9351</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-9351</guid>
		<description>To Amy Anderson, and other women out there like her, I offer this:  http://www.youtube.com/bethatwoman

The day of the woman is here, and it is not motherhood, or whether or not she has pursued a professional direction that defines her.  It is her ability, as a woman, to rise from her current challenges and circumstances to be that woman who inspires, who contributes, and who pays it forward.  That is a woman&#039;s power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Amy Anderson, and other women out there like her, I offer this:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/bethatwoman" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/bethatwoman</a></p>
<p>The day of the woman is here, and it is not motherhood, or whether or not she has pursued a professional direction that defines her.  It is her ability, as a woman, to rise from her current challenges and circumstances to be that woman who inspires, who contributes, and who pays it forward.  That is a woman&#8217;s power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bella DePaulo</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-9089</link>
		<dc:creator>Bella DePaulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-9089</guid>
		<description>I read every word of the Shriver Report and was disappointed with the marginalization not just of women who were not mothers, but also those who were not married -- or worst of all, not mothers and not married. 

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200910/shriver-s-woman-s-nation-is-actually-wife-and-mother-s-nation-the-evidence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read every word of the Shriver Report and was disappointed with the marginalization not just of women who were not mothers, but also those who were not married &#8212; or worst of all, not mothers and not married. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200910/shriver-s-woman-s-nation-is-actually-wife-and-mother-s-nation-the-evidence" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200910/shriver-s-woman-s-nation-is-actually-wife-and-mother-s-nation-the-evidence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Woman's Nation...huh? &#124; Connecting Career and Life</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-9016</link>
		<dc:creator>A Woman's Nation...huh? &#124; Connecting Career and Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-9016</guid>
		<description>[...] Maria Shriver Says It’s a Woman’s Nation. Do You? by Joanne Bamberger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maria Shriver Says It’s a Woman’s Nation. Do You? by Joanne Bamberger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cayce</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-8880</link>
		<dc:creator>Cayce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-8880</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;John Podesta, the CAP’s president, proudly proclaimed that the results of the report are proof that “the battle of the sexes is over.”&lt;/i&gt;

Aww.  That&#039;s cute.  And we&#039;re in a &quot;post-racial&quot; America, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>John Podesta, the CAP’s president, proudly proclaimed that the results of the report are proof that “the battle of the sexes is over.”</i></p>
<p>Aww.  That&#8217;s cute.  And we&#8217;re in a &#8220;post-racial&#8221; America, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PunditMom</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>PunditMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>Not feeling comfortable with our power is the flip side of the fear coin.  I fight every day with being comfortable with it vs. thinking that I wasn&#039;t raised to think about it.

As for an action plan?  Yeah -- we definitely need one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not feeling comfortable with our power is the flip side of the fear coin.  I fight every day with being comfortable with it vs. thinking that I wasn&#8217;t raised to think about it.</p>
<p>As for an action plan?  Yeah &#8212; we definitely need one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Woman&#8217;s Nation Should Change Everything &#171; Moms in the Lobby</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-8876</link>
		<dc:creator>A Woman&#8217;s Nation Should Change Everything &#171; Moms in the Lobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-8876</guid>
		<description>[...] and programming, they have also been working the bloggers for attention.  One of my regular reads, PunditMom, featured a post on the report and included details of a bloggers-only conference call where [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and programming, they have also been working the bloggers for attention.  One of my regular reads, PunditMom, featured a post on the report and included details of a bloggers-only conference call where [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilinap</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-8873</link>
		<dc:creator>ilinap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-8873</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s funny is that my dad told me about this report and is keen on seeing her findings actually come to fruition. I have been preaching the (purchasing) power of women for years now. I worked specifically in this segment while at a major financial services firm. The powers that be handed us a tiny piece of the budget to shut us up and demonstrate their embrace of &quot;diversity.&quot; We skyrocketed sales within a year, and revenues from women investors stayed steady while male counterparts declined. Women do have power. We simply have to feel comfortable with it, leverage it, and stop stepping on and judging each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s funny is that my dad told me about this report and is keen on seeing her findings actually come to fruition. I have been preaching the (purchasing) power of women for years now. I worked specifically in this segment while at a major financial services firm. The powers that be handed us a tiny piece of the budget to shut us up and demonstrate their embrace of &#8220;diversity.&#8221; We skyrocketed sales within a year, and revenues from women investors stayed steady while male counterparts declined. Women do have power. We simply have to feel comfortable with it, leverage it, and stop stepping on and judging each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Pippert</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-8872</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Pippert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-8872</guid>
		<description>All right, all balls on the court...

Everyone here has expressed all of the various points of my concern so well -- brava all!

Joanne, you and Alamar pointed out the &quot;moms -- currently parenting&quot; focus. Melanie Notkin, Elisa Camahort and others discussed this (as much as one can) on Twitter and I was happy to join in that conversation. I got some incredibly valuable points that are extremely relevant:

1. The benefits mentioned would benefit all women, not just working mothers, but the overall effort is exclusionary of women who are not currently parenting (whether they are mothers or not). This excludes women who do not have children (of various ages -- so some might be engaged because they plan to become mothers, but others may have chosen to not have children or do not have children) and women who no longer have children in the house.

2. Changing the language to be more inclusionary is not the correct response. Elisa wisely said that the better response is to correctly identify it for what it is &quot;a mom&#039;s nation.&quot;

3. Non-parenting moms have different needs that also need to be addressed. Not to mention, it&#039;s time to include them in the conversation. The brief mention of &quot;moms and caregivers&quot; hit in a tiny way on the fact that there is a sandwich generation taking care of people on both sides. That&#039;s as close as it came, and again, it seemed to target women who are moms.

Amy brilliantly said, &quot;And like Julie, I’m wondering what the action plan is and where Momsrising, the one of the major netroots organizations that has made some headway on these issues in recent years, is in this report given that it outlines the core issues that are the foundation of momsrising’s mission. I’m surprised they have not even commented on the report or the NBC series.&quot;

I&#039;m wondering and surprised too, until a little niggling thought occurred to me -- having caught wind that netroots groups such as MomsRising and WomenCount were making headway and taking action, is this a pre-emptive retention action?

Hence my last bullet point.

Plus, it sets up a nice segue into why women are afraid: so often their very empowerment is in name only, and gets snatched away from them by the Powers That Be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, all balls on the court&#8230;</p>
<p>Everyone here has expressed all of the various points of my concern so well &#8212; brava all!</p>
<p>Joanne, you and Alamar pointed out the &#8220;moms &#8212; currently parenting&#8221; focus. Melanie Notkin, Elisa Camahort and others discussed this (as much as one can) on Twitter and I was happy to join in that conversation. I got some incredibly valuable points that are extremely relevant:</p>
<p>1. The benefits mentioned would benefit all women, not just working mothers, but the overall effort is exclusionary of women who are not currently parenting (whether they are mothers or not). This excludes women who do not have children (of various ages &#8212; so some might be engaged because they plan to become mothers, but others may have chosen to not have children or do not have children) and women who no longer have children in the house.</p>
<p>2. Changing the language to be more inclusionary is not the correct response. Elisa wisely said that the better response is to correctly identify it for what it is &#8220;a mom&#8217;s nation.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. Non-parenting moms have different needs that also need to be addressed. Not to mention, it&#8217;s time to include them in the conversation. The brief mention of &#8220;moms and caregivers&#8221; hit in a tiny way on the fact that there is a sandwich generation taking care of people on both sides. That&#8217;s as close as it came, and again, it seemed to target women who are moms.</p>
<p>Amy brilliantly said, &#8220;And like Julie, I’m wondering what the action plan is and where Momsrising, the one of the major netroots organizations that has made some headway on these issues in recent years, is in this report given that it outlines the core issues that are the foundation of momsrising’s mission. I’m surprised they have not even commented on the report or the NBC series.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering and surprised too, until a little niggling thought occurred to me &#8212; having caught wind that netroots groups such as MomsRising and WomenCount were making headway and taking action, is this a pre-emptive retention action?</p>
<p>Hence my last bullet point.</p>
<p>Plus, it sets up a nice segue into why women are afraid: so often their very empowerment is in name only, and gets snatched away from them by the Powers That Be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy@UWM</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2009/10/maria-shriver-says-its-a-womans-nation-do-you/comment-page-1#comment-8865</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy@UWM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=3136#comment-8865</guid>
		<description>Man, SO jealous that you, Morra and Julie got to talk to Maria in person. Love her. All of the issues outlined in this report are the very reason I became a blogger. Blogging offered me a platform to talk about my frustrations with being a working mom and the societal barriers that have to change if my daughters have any hope of having an easier time of trying to balance it all. And of course, I blogged about this new report tonight too which simply confirmed everything I&#039;ve been blogging about for nearly three years.

I&#039;m glad someone with clout and credibility has taken the opportunity to shine a light on the issues in a big way. I think it&#039;s good timing, particularly after our tanking economy has stirred an appetite for greater balance and things that will truly improve quality of life beyond compiling material wealth. And like Valerie Jarrett said on Meet the Press, bringing these issues into the national dialogue is the first step. 

But like you, I wonder if it will turn into anything more than just some good TV. And like Julie, I&#039;m wondering what the action plan is and where Momsrising, the one of the major netroots organizations that has made some headway on these issues in recent years, is in this report given that it outlines the core issues that are the foundation of momsrising&#039;s mission. I&#039;m surprised they have not even commented on the report or the NBC series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, SO jealous that you, Morra and Julie got to talk to Maria in person. Love her. All of the issues outlined in this report are the very reason I became a blogger. Blogging offered me a platform to talk about my frustrations with being a working mom and the societal barriers that have to change if my daughters have any hope of having an easier time of trying to balance it all. And of course, I blogged about this new report tonight too which simply confirmed everything I&#8217;ve been blogging about for nearly three years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad someone with clout and credibility has taken the opportunity to shine a light on the issues in a big way. I think it&#8217;s good timing, particularly after our tanking economy has stirred an appetite for greater balance and things that will truly improve quality of life beyond compiling material wealth. And like Valerie Jarrett said on Meet the Press, bringing these issues into the national dialogue is the first step. </p>
<p>But like you, I wonder if it will turn into anything more than just some good TV. And like Julie, I&#8217;m wondering what the action plan is and where Momsrising, the one of the major netroots organizations that has made some headway on these issues in recent years, is in this report given that it outlines the core issues that are the foundation of momsrising&#8217;s mission. I&#8217;m surprised they have not even commented on the report or the NBC series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

