Comments on: Sarah Palin Redux

By: DEO

DEO — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:41:30 +0000

Couric: What newspapers do you read? Palin: uh, all of ‘em…

Beck: Who is your favorite founder? Palin: uh, all of ‘em…

Sarah, what is your favorite color? …uh, all of ‘em…

Well, IF Kevin says that’s OK! Yeah, she’s brilliant, she has wowed me YET AGAIN!

How can the bar be so LOW for you palinbots?

…incidentally, WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE COLOR is the caliber of question she is ASKED by conservative media, and she BARS the rest of the media from even approaching her.
Palin is going to have to debate sometime, she will have to hold an OPEN press conference sometime…OR the other alternative is that she remain a coward and keep collecting huge checks and contributions for being the FACE of the Republican party. This is OK with Kevin.

By: Daisy

Daisy — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:39:42 +0000

Gulp. Dumb like a fox, indeed. I’m so embarrassed by her lack of knowledge; her teachers are probably hiding under their desks, especially her history teachers!

By: Warren

Warren — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:37:57 +0000

If George W. Dunderhead has succeeded in lowering the bar for any black-sheep trust-fundian screw-up with a powerful papa in politics to have a clear shot at being leader of the free world, then Sarah has certainly out-limboed the former Commander-in-Puppet by shattering the glass basement for both women and humanity alike.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/warren-holstein/foxs-barracuda-jumps-the_b_422755.html

By: PunditMom

PunditMom — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:17:42 +0000

Really? You call that rambling, grasping response an actual “answer?” I think most high school students could give a more coherent and thoughtful response than that

By: Kevin

Kevin — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:15:10 +0000

What’s the problem? She answered the question. Chris “shiver up my leg” Matthews even acknowledged that she answered the question and then continued to say that she didn’t answer it.

Which is it?

I watched her answer the question. Matthews even said she chose a good one and gave reasons why.

They are SPECULATING that she doesn’t know the names of the founding fathers. But her answer didn’t give them any solid information to back up their speculation.

You’re grasping at straws. Your argument has no foundation. You’re pathetic. This is why your party is going to lose ALL power by 2012.

By: Lisse

Lisse — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:24:14 +0000

You know, I tried. I just couldn’t get all the way through that.

It’s like when the George Costanza character from Sienfeld would come on screen and make a complete ass out of himself. I’d have to leave the room, because I couldn’t watch. And that was fiction!