<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PunditMom &#187; Breastfeeding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punditmom.com/tag/breastfeeding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punditmom.com</link>
	<description>Having an opinion never goes out of style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breastfeeding Moms Equal Capitol Hill Bipartisanship</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2011/01/breastfeeding-moms-equal-capitol-hill-bipartisanship</link>
		<comments>http://www.punditmom.com/2011/01/breastfeeding-moms-equal-capitol-hill-bipartisanship#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PunditMom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moms & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipartisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mothers and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/?p=6863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Networking in non-traditional settings is nothing new for women. When our husbands think we&#8217;re just hanging out with the girls or managing the soccer game and birthday party schedules for our kids, we know that those relationships can be, and &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Networking in non-traditional settings is nothing new for women. When our husbands think we&#8217;re just hanging out with the girls or managing the soccer game and birthday party schedules for our kids, we know that those relationships can be, and usually are, much more than just lost time. So when I read a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/us/02lactation.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=nursing%20mothers&amp;st=cse">recent New York Times story</a> about women on both sides of the political aisle taking advantage of Capitol Hill lactation rooms, I thought that these so-called &#8220;boob cubes&#8221; could be one small step, if not the key, to the new American bipartisanship.</p>
<p>And guess what?  I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks it&#8217;s time to embrace new ways to make a power play on Capitol Hill.  Read more about the new stealth networking techniques at my<a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/01/05/capitol-hill-breastfeeding-can-boob-cubes-boost-bipartisanshi/"> Politics Daily</a> column!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.punditmom.com/2011/01/breastfeeding-moms-equal-capitol-hill-bipartisanship/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Know This Would All be Different if Men Could Breastfeed</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2007/11/you-know-this-would-all-be-different-if-men-could-breastfeed</link>
		<comments>http://www.punditmom.com/2007/11/you-know-this-would-all-be-different-if-men-could-breastfeed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PunditMom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[League of Maternal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we;re made as hell and we're not going to take it anymore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/2007/11/you-know-this-would-all-be-different-if-men-could-breastfeed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/R02kj2aer5I/AAAAAAAAAtk/glKd2HOFr6o/s1600-h/cassat_mother_rose_nrs_hr_baby1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/R02kj2aer5I/AAAAAAAAAtk/glKd2HOFr6o/s200/cassat_mother_rose_nrs_hr_baby1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5137943685708558226" border="0" /></a>First <a href="http://www.leagueofmaternaljustice.com/2007/09/welcome-to-the-.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Facebook</span> banned photos of breastfeeding mothers</a>.  Now <a href="http://www.leagueofmaternaljustice.com/2007/11/its-only-just-b.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">YouTube</span> has jumped on the bandwagon.</a></p>
<p><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">YouTube</span> claims these photos of mothers who are rather discretely feeding their children violate the Terms of Use of their sites because such photos are &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/R02kj2aer5I/AAAAAAAAAtk/glKd2HOFr6o/s1600-h/cassat_mother_rose_nrs_hr_baby1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/R02kj2aer5I/AAAAAAAAAtk/glKd2HOFr6o/s200/cassat_mother_rose_nrs_hr_baby1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5137943685708558226" border="0" /></a>First <a href="http://www.leagueofmaternaljustice.com/2007/09/welcome-to-the-.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Facebook</span> banned photos of breastfeeding mothers</a>.  Now <a href="http://www.leagueofmaternaljustice.com/2007/11/its-only-just-b.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">YouTube</span> has jumped on the bandwagon.</a></p>
<p><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">YouTube</span> claims these photos of mothers who are rather discretely feeding their children violate the Terms of Use of their sites because such photos are inappropriate and sexually explicit.</p>
<p>But <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a5-QmmWloc">stripping videos </a>are OK with them.  And of course a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zTMXTMmOIw&amp;feature=dir">Victoria&#8217;s Secret &#8220;pajama&#8221; commercial</a> is fine.  One called <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-mMtpn2fKw&amp;feature=related">&#8220;Sexy Heidi <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Klum</span> Almost Nude&#8221;</a> apparently is not a problem either for those Terms of Use.</p>
<p>If these videos of supermodels prancing around in next to nothing and home movies of girlfriends shaking their <span style="font-style: italic;">boo-<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">TAYS</span> </span>are permissible and not sexually explicit in the eyes of these social networks, then why are breastfeeding photos?  In both cases, the same amount of breast flesh is exposed.  And breastfeeding a baby is not meant to arouse the men-folk while, I dare say, the other examples are.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s really the issue here, isn&#8217;t it?  It&#8217;s not really about inappropriateness, but about how women are viewed by men.    Otherwise, as I might have argued before a judge in my previous life, don&#8217;t we have a distinction without a difference here?</p>
<p>This is just one of the more obvious ways that illustrates our society&#8217;s inherent lack of respect for women.</p>
<p>One type of video is meant for men&#8217;s amusement and pleasure and the other isn&#8217;t.  When I was researching a story for <a href="http://lifestyle.msn.com/mindbodyandsoul/womenintheworld/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5537148">Breast Cancer Awareness month</a>, I asked one person I interviewed why so many companies are interested in jumping on the breast cancer awareness bandwagon and not other diseases that impact women as much, if not  more?</p>
<p>Her answer?  Sadly, that breast cancer has more sex appeal than heart disease.</p>
<p>This battle with <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Facebook</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">YouTube</span> is really just a symptom of the larger lack of respect problem &#8212;  the absence of real workplace policies that support women after they&#8217;ve had babies, the willingness of our schools to expect working mothers to take their time to work on projects for the kids but not working fathers, the presence of <a href="http://www.punditmom.com/2007/05/ruth-bader-ginsburg-cant-do-it-alone.html">only one woman justice on the Supreme Court,</a> and the rulings written by male justices that show that we really have not come very far in ridding ourselves of  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/18/AR2007041800710.html">paternalistic views toward women</a>.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s impossible to tackle all the issues women and working mothers face at any given moment, there is something we can do now to promote the cause today as it relates to policies that protect breastfeeding mothers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leagueofmaternaljustice.com/">The League of Maternal Justice</a> has provided a series of tips about what we can do right now to start to make change.     Take a trip over there to check them out.  Our voices are loud and strong when we&#8217;re getting the kids to do their chores, so why not use them to take this first step toward gaining the respect we deserve?</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t put up with disrespect from a second-grader.  I&#8217;m certainly not to going stand for it from a bunch of men who&#8217;d have contests and awards for themselves if they were the ones in charge of the breastfeeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.punditmom.com/2007/11/you-know-this-would-all-be-different-if-men-could-breastfeed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Practices??</title>
		<link>http://www.punditmom.com/2007/09/breast-practices</link>
		<comments>http://www.punditmom.com/2007/09/breast-practices#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PunditMom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditmom.com/2007/09/breast-practices</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/Ru7-yp5vjKI/AAAAAAAAAag/3GYFlC4zjwo/s1600-h/maternite.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/Ru7-yp5vjKI/AAAAAAAAAag/3GYFlC4zjwo/s200/maternite.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5111302773307051170" border="0" /></a><br />OK, let me make sure I&#8217;ve got this straight &#8212; if I&#8217;m a breastfeeding mom, I can&#8217;t share photos of breastfeeding my child on MySpace or <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/09/facebook-cracks.html">Facebook</a>, but if I want to starve myself until <a href="http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/ap/nyr10601121937.widec.jpg">I look like this</a>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/Ru7-yp5vjKI/AAAAAAAAAag/3GYFlC4zjwo/s1600-h/maternite.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.punditmom.com/wp-content/uploads/blogger/_6YvsyPHfGqY/Ru7-yp5vjKI/AAAAAAAAAag/3GYFlC4zjwo/s200/maternite.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5111302773307051170" border="0" /></a><br />OK, let me make sure I&#8217;ve got this straight &#8212; if I&#8217;m a breastfeeding mom, I can&#8217;t share photos of breastfeeding my child on MySpace or <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/09/facebook-cracks.html">Facebook</a>, but if I want to starve myself until <a href="http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/ap/nyr10601121937.widec.jpg">I look like this</a>, <span style="font-style: italic;">no problemo.</span></p>
<p>I knew that <a href="http://svmomblog.typepad.com/dc_metro_moms/2007/09/breastfeeding-m.html">Bill Maher decided to publicly mock breastfeeding mothers</a>, but, not being one myself, I wasn&#8217;t aware of Facebook and MySpace deciding that such photos were obscene until I took a look at <a href="http://itsnotalecture.blogspot.com/2007/09/facebook-better-smarten-up-fast.html">this post by David over at <span style="font-style: italic;">It&#8217;s Not A Lecture.</span></a></p>
<p>It seems like everybody&#8217;s out for the breasts these days and not in a good way.</p>
<p>The message that&#8217;s being sent is clear and it&#8217;s not a good one &#8212; breasts in their natural state must not be seen in public, but breasts for entertainment, especially &#8220;enhanced&#8221; ones &#8212;  <span style="font-style: italic;">AWESOME!</span></p>
<p>So the issue that&#8217;s been unspoken for years is finally out there &#8212; men&#8217;s entertainment vs. the health of women and children.    Boob jobs vs. natural mammaries.</p>
<p>The occasional inadvertent &#8220;wardrobe malfunction&#8221; brings a<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2004-09-07-bowl_x.htm"> half million dollar fine.</a>  On the flip side, who knows how much the photographers of Britney&#8217;s <a href="http://www.accesshollywood.com/news/ah6435.shtml">formerly private parts</a> got paid to share them with us.</p>
<p>As adults, we can sift through the hypocrisy and make our own judgments.  We can ignore the photos or choose one social networking site over another.  But as for our children, especially our daughters, the messages that are being sent in the media they frequent are the worst possible.</p>
<p>If I tried to post the image above of Picasso&#8217;s work <span style="font-style: italic;">Maternite </span>on Facebook, it would get removed.  Wasn&#8217;t there a time when <a href="http://www.goingbraless.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=13979&amp;sid=1ea64d8d0659704d03359b88833bf037">images of breastfeeding mothers were celebrated?</a></p>
<p>Clearly those days are gone, and we&#8217;ll be stuck with images like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://photobucket.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u243/sporty027/Britney%20Spears/britney_spears.png" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>as &#8220;art&#8221; unless we do something about it.</p>
<p>Boycott, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.punditmom.com/2007/09/breast-practices/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

